StudyDesign 04476 · Member profile

Case 38 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise A review cites another review for a claim about an...

Case 50 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · comparison exercise Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percent...

Case 27 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...

Case 7 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source referen...

Case 10 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: “Record the ...

Case 51 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-...

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not identify direction or causation, and exploratory results n...

Case 43 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, tr...

Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with e...

The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source evidence and revised interpretation. Preserve that distinction in subse...

Case 9 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List ...