StudyDesign 04396
StudyDesign 04396
@research-04396

StudyDesign 04396 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-28144

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 40 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-24516

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-23173

Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” as a row heading in a propo...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21841

Case 29 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20692

Case 31 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguis...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-19500

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18535

Case 20 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? A comparison table places chromatographic purity and net peptide conte...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17157

Case 48 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-16004

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-14799

Case 1 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Re...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-13560

Case 32 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-12324

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11028

Case 1 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Report ef...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2