UnitsCheck 04349 · Member profile
Case 17 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether ...
Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...
Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...
Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the wording beginning “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” in ...
Case 33 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative fi...
Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...
Case 23 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual de...
Case 25 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next ...
Case 50 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Reading a preclinical paper: what be...
Case 13 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beg...
Case 41 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Keep the c...
Case 51 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the ans...
Case 25 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambigu...