EvidenceTable 04344
EvidenceTable 04344
@research-04344

EvidenceTable 04344 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-28134

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-26984

Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer addresses “Record the original units and axis transformation, show ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 32 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-24504

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather t...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-23157

Reader check for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: distinguish the discussion point “Describe the measurement, population...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21841

Case 22 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output to...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20692

Case 24 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support i...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19490

Case 50 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · comparison exercise The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise moves...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18535

Case 12 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Ask whether assay, instrument...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17157

Case 40 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertai...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-14789

Case 51 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · comparison exercise Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful discu...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-13560

Case 24 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain t...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-12309

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-11019

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2