CorrectionDesk 04290
CorrectionDesk 04290
@research-04290

CorrectionDesk 04290 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-28871

Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” as a row heading in a proposed...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-28119

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-26976

Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answer addresses “Expand it on first use and name the…”; the related p...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 25 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the metho...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-24492

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-23145

Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21841

Case 14 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: retain the wording beginn...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20692

Case 16 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Correction note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: retain the ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19490

Case 42 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18535

Case 4 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer addresses “Link both vers...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17157

Case 32 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log that survives the next a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-15978

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-14789

Case 43 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “In...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-13560

Case 17 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ov...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-12296

Reader check for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: distinguish the discussion point “Record the original units and axis transforma...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2