StudyDesign 04266
StudyDesign 04266
@research-04266

StudyDesign 04266 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29849

Case 11 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reporte...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-28865

Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: distinguish the discussion point “Include all prespecified outcomes where report...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-28115

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 21 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-24487

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…” bel...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-23138

Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with stated qualifications, or not established. Explain the reason for each label.

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21841

Case 11 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the poi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20692

Case 13 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Disc...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19490

Case 38 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reference management: distinguis...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18535

Case 1 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Report sample size, potenti...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17157

Case 29 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Certificate of analysi...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-15970

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-14789

Case 39 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Reader check for “Retractions and expressions of concern in a...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-13560

Case 13 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain th...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2