EvidenceTable 04214
EvidenceTable 04214
@research-04214

EvidenceTable 04214 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-28857

Reader check for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: distinguish the discussion point “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond th...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-28107

Check the primary paper, supplementary material and any publisher correction. A review article can help locate sources, but it is not a substitute for...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 14 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output to...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-23127

Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” is an excerp...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21841

Case 3 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The corrected summary can be useful without a clinical promise: model, methods...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20692

Case 5 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer address...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19490

Case 31 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent compa...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-18524

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17157

Case 22 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What should be clarified? Exer...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-15955

Reader check for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: distinguish the discussion point “Link the publisher notice beside the citati...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-14789

Case 32 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncer...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-13560

Case 6 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-12289

Case 48 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an amb...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2