StudyDesign 04076 · Member profile
Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...
Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...
Case 43 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Method note for “A literature note that separates hyp...
Case 46 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise m...
Case 47 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: ...
Case 26 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the re...
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
Case 11 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain th...
Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...
Case 2 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output t...
Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” is an excerpt from the discu...
Case 12 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording begi...
Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row ...