SourceIndex 03957 · Member profile
Case 20 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”:...
Case 22 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together A table has been copied into a new format without its source or transformat...
State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...
Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...
Case 28 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reference management: distingui...
Case 30 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...
Case 30 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A literature note that separates h...
Case 9 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source referen...
Case 33 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative fi...
Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: use “Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection cont...
Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...
Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresses “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…”;...
The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. Use method-specific wording rather than a blanket verified or safe label.