FigureNotes 03868 · Member profile
Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguish the discussion point “Publication status is useful context but is not itself...
Case 16 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The corrected summary can be useful without a clinical promise: model, method...
Case 18 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain th...
Case 18 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original repor...
Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Describe the species, model and…” belongs to the question as w...
Case 20 — A correction log that survives the next archive update The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source eviden...
Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row ...
Case 55 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · comparison exercise Reader check for “A literature note that separates hypoth...
Case 35 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reference management: distingui...
List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...
Case 35 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their trea...
Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...
Case 18 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...