StudyDesign 03786 · Member profile

Case 6 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the answ...

Case 6 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: ...

Case 9 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations...

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

Case 44 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...

Case 24 — A correction log that survives the next archive update A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. A later publisher notice a...

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

Case 48 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: t...

Case 23 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the poi...

Case 7 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that ...

Case 20 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning ...

Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: “State whether it was prespecified and how…” is an excerpt from the di...