ArchiveReader 03765
ArchiveReader 03765
@research-03765

ArchiveReader 03765 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-28092

Case 4 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary so...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-26934

Case 4 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “I...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25897

Case 3 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-23073

Case 6 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study cond...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-21724

Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: the point beginning “Use separate entries for the internal transcription c...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20616

Case 41 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”:...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19469

Case 21 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A reagent dossier contains a summary purity percentage but not the metho...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-18407

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-17103

Case 45 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-15901

Case 20 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginni...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-14747

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-13525

Case 4 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ove...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-12257

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-10924

Case 17 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain th...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2