StudyDesign 03746 · Member profile
Case 2 — A correction log for an archive article Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the...
Case 1 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observa...
Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...
Case 3 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List ...
Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” as a row heading in a proposed...
Case 38 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Keep th...
Case 18 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output ...
Case 43 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study...
Case 17 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel w...
Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summ...
Case 1 — A correction log for an archive article Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the c...
Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: distinguish the discussion point “Describe the species, model and…” from its propose...
Case 15 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What should be clarified? Exer...