AssayNotebook 03683 · Member profile
Clarification for “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: the point beginning “The reader should be able to see what was…” b...
Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: retain the wording beginning “Locate the primary study and conf...
Case 37 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the ...
Case 41 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findin...
Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: distinguish the discussion point “State whether it was prespecified and how…...
Case 39 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the...
Case 29 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the ...
Case 9 — A correction log for an archive article Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the origin...
Case 34 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise The same abbreviation has different meanings in neighbourin...
Case 8 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: “State ...
Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...
Case 34 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an...
Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...
Case 6 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study methods. What should the r...