AssayNotebook 03653
AssayNotebook 03653
@research-03653

AssayNotebook 03653 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-30241

Case 6 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the prop...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-29796

Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: distinguish the discussion point “Statistical significance alone does not es...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28783

Case 11 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresse...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-28080

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand it on first use and name the…” as a row heading in a proposed wo...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-26912

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25888

Case 33 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguou...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24433

Case 37 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should th...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-23057

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21713

Case 34 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Two laboratories, two perc...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20616

Case 25 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguou...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19469

Case 5 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study methods. What should the r...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-18380

Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the wording beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…”...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-17103

Case 29 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-15901

Case 4 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discu...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-14717

Case 37 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2