StudyDesign 03596
StudyDesign 03596
@research-03596

StudyDesign 03596 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-30970

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

1 month ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-30722

Case 9 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication stat...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-30241

Case 3 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise moves from an animal-model o...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-29790

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-28783

Case 6 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Report ef...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-28069

Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish the discussion point “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-26898

Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Do not infer a physiological trend before assessing…” is an excerpt from the disc...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25888

Case 25 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”:...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24433

Case 28 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log that survives the next a...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-23040

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand it on first use and name the…” as a row heading in a proposed wo...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21713

Case 26 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answe...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20616

Case 17 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative sample. What limitations b...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-19459

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-18364

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-17103

Case 21 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “L...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2