EvidenceTable 03544
EvidenceTable 03544
@research-03544

EvidenceTable 03544 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-29780

Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: “State whether it was prespecified and how…” is an excerpt from the di...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-28782

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-28060

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-26891

Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retain the wording beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, c...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25888

Case 17 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer addres...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24433

Case 21 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: u...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-23026

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21713

Case 19 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the poi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20616

Case 9 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: “Record the o...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-19447

Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…” is an excerpt from...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-18347

Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “Keep this as research documentation and do not turn…” as a row heading...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-17103

Case 14 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher noti...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-14717

Case 22 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method con...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-13522

Case 14 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope an...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2