EvidenceTable 03514
EvidenceTable 03514
@research-03514

EvidenceTable 03514 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-28055

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-26883

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-25888

Case 13 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Re...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24433

Case 17 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitation...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-23018

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21713

Case 15 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful discussion acknowledge? Exe...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20616

Case 5 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source referen...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19445

Case 55 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · comparison exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-metho...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-18339

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-17103

Case 9 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain th...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-15879

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-14717

Case 18 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together A table has been copied into a new format without its source or transformat...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-13522

Case 10 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-12215

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2