StudyDesign 03436 · Member profile
Case 25 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: dist...
Case 12 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher noti...
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
Case 3 — A correction log that survives the next archive update If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailab...
Reader check for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: distinguish the discussion point “Use separate entries for the internal tra...
Case 38 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A literature note that separates h...
Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...
Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...
Case 2 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all presp...
Case 6 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established clin...
State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...
Case 3 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer add...
Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” belongs to the...