StudyDesign 03426 · Member profile

The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source evidence and revised interpretation. Preserve that distinction in subse...

Case 37 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference range...

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

Case 1 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative sample. What limitations be...

Case 4 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Rea...

Case 2 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whether assay, instrument, un...

Case 42 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source...

Case 47 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log that survives the next a...

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

Case 52 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · comparison exercise Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous ab...

Case 5 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Identify population...

Case 46 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Two laboratories, two perc...