CorrectionDesk 03410 · Member profile
Case 3 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notic...
Reader check for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: distinguish the discussion point “Create separate columns fo...
Case 36 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. ...
Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...
Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...
Case 2 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method cond...
Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...
Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” as a row headin...
Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...
Case 40 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the lab...
Case 45 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Two laboratories, two p...
Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…” bel...
Case 50 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source,...