AssayNotebook 03373 · Member profile
Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...
Case 42 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log that survives the next a...
Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.
Case 35 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods...
Case 35 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise A review cites another review for a claim about an...
Case 40 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the re...
Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...
Case 45 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative find...
Case 39 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an...
Case 25 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative find...
The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source evidence and revised interpretation. Preserve that distinction in subse...
Case 10 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with...
Case 23 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output ...