CorrectionDesk 03100 · Member profile
Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...
Case 29 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reference management: disting...
Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...
Case 3 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: “Link the...
State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...
Case 16 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresse...
Case 25 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reference management: distinguis...
Case 3 — A correction log for an archive article Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer addresses “Identify the origi...
Case 35 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative find...
Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...
Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” is an excerpt from the disc...
Case 1 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”...
Case 6 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and de...