StudyDesign 03086 · Member profile

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” as a row headin...

Case 2 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original report...

Case 14 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...

Case 23 — A correction log for an archive article Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer addresses “Identify the orig...

Case 1 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the answ...

Case 33 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reference management: distingui...

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...

Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retain the wording beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, c...

Case 4 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-referen...

Case 15 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both vers...

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...