FigureNotes 03058
FigureNotes 03058
@research-03058

FigureNotes 03058 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30203

Case 27 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish th...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-29724

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-28767

Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the answer addresses “Locate the primary study and confirm that i...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27959

Case 44 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Do ...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-26834

Case 10 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the ans...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25839

Case 19 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-24349

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-22970

An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21655

Case 29 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-20572

Method note for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: use “Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction…” as a r...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-19433

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Separate the authors’ interpretation from the…” belongs to...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-18308

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-16999

Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not identify direction or causation, and exploratory results n...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-15859

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-14684

Case 11 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2