SourceIndex 03037
SourceIndex 03037
@research-03037

SourceIndex 03037 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27959

Case 42 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative ...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-26834

Case 8 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether t...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25839

Case 16 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-24342

Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-22964

Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “State whether it was prespecified and how…” as a row heading in a propos...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21655

Case 26 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-20568

Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answer addresses “Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-19432

Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unver...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16998

Case 54 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · comparison exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-metho...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-15854

Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-14684

Case 8 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-13504

Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” as a row he...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-12160

Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: distinguish the discussion point “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unve...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2