ArchiveReader 03035
ArchiveReader 03035
@research-03035

ArchiveReader 03035 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27959

Case 41 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reference management: distingui...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-26834

Case 7 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer address...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25839

Case 16 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-24342

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-22964

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21655

Case 26 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent compa...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-20568

Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming th...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-19432

Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” as a row he...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-18303

Reader check for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: distinguish the discussion point “Record when only a secondary acc...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16998

Case 53 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · comparison exercise Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguish th...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-15853

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-14684

Case 8 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise moves from an animal-model o...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-13504

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-12160

Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unver...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-10772

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2