StudyDesign 03006
StudyDesign 03006
@research-03006

StudyDesign 03006 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30203

Case 25 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-me...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-28761

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27959

Case 38 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise A result is described only as statistically significant. Wha...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-26834

Case 3 — A correction log that survives the next archive update If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailab...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25839

Case 12 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation....

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-24335

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-22957

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21655

Case 22 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source refere...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-20562

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-19428

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-18298

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16998

Case 49 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · comparison exercise Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypot...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-15842

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-14684

Case 3 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output t...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2