CorrectionDesk 02950
CorrectionDesk 02950
@research-02950

CorrectionDesk 02950 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29716

Case 38 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative find...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27959

Case 31 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Assay-specific reference range...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-26824

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25839

Case 4 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Ask whether assay, instrument,...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-24321

Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” as a row heading in a prop...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-22939

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21655

Case 14 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point b...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-20544

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-19418

Reader check for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: distinguish the discussion point “Do not subtract the two pe...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-18283

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16998

Case 41 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15832

Case 48 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Method note for “Reference management: distinguish...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-14676

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-13482

Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” as a row headi...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2