CorrectionDesk 02940
CorrectionDesk 02940
@research-02940

CorrectionDesk 02940 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 19
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27959

Case 29 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reading a preclinical paper: wha...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-26823

Case 56 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, tran...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25839

Case 3 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-24321

Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21655

Case 12 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-20542

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-19418

Method note for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: use “Create separate columns for the quantity measured,…” as ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-18280

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16998

Case 40 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the re...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15832

Case 46 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish th...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-13478

Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: distinguish the discussion point “Differences in biology and study conditions limit ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-12134

Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: distinguish the discussion point “Describe the species, model and…” from its propose...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2