CorrectionDesk 02920
CorrectionDesk 02920
@research-02920

CorrectionDesk 02920 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 5 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29716

Case 36 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise A review cites another review for a claim about an...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-28744

Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” as a row he...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27959

Case 27 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Method note for “Certificate of analysis: whic...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-26823

Case 53 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concern in...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-24319

Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not identify direction or causation, and exploratory results n...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21655

Case 10 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative sample. What limitations b...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-20539

Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer addresses “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-19413

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-18273

Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measureme...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16998

Case 37 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Do ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15832

Case 44 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What mak...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-14667

Clarification for “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: the point beginning “Put the species or model, design, comparator ...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2