CorrectionDesk 02910
CorrectionDesk 02910
@research-02910

CorrectionDesk 02910 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-28741

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27959

Case 25 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: distin...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-26823

Case 52 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · comparison exercise Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What sho...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-25833

Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” as a row heading in a prop...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-24316

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-22926

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21655

Case 8 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Limit of the answer in “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: “Describe the species, ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-20537

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-19409

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-18273

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16998

Case 36 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcome...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15832

Case 42 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the met...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-14665

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-12128

Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginning “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” belongs to the...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2