EvidenceTable 02904
EvidenceTable 02904
@research-02904

EvidenceTable 02904 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-26823

Case 51 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · comparison exercise Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-25830

Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: “State the study design and what was actually measured…” is an ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-22924

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21655

Case 7 — A correction log for an archive article Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the wording beginning “Identify...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-20536

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-19407

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-18272

Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the wording beginning “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” in ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16998

Case 35 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”:...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15832

Case 41 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-14663

Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning “Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinicia...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-13469

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-12128

Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginning “Record the original units and axis transformation, show a...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-10737

Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” is an excerpt from the ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-09593

Case 24 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to p...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2