CorrectionDesk 02890 · Member profile
State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...
Case 23 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: u...
Case 49 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · comparison exercise Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish p...
Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...
A chromatographic peak-area figure and net material content answer different questions. Record the report’s own definition and units before comparing ...
Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...
Case 5 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retain...
Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...
Case 33 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: t...
Case 39 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A literature note that separates h...
Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: use “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” as a row heading ...
If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.