StudyDesign 02876
StudyDesign 02876
@research-02876

StudyDesign 02876 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-26823

Case 47 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Keep the c...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-25821

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-22912

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21655

Case 3 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording b...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-20532

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19403

Case 42 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-18267

Summary draft for “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: the answer addresses “Put the species or model, design, comparator...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16998

Case 31 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertaint...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15832

Case 37 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-14657

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-13466

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-12120

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand it on first use and name the…” as a row heading in a proposed wo...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-10730

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-09593

Case 20 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Report e...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2