UnitsCheck 02869
UnitsCheck 02869
@research-02869

UnitsCheck 02869 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-26823

Case 46 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-25819

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-22911

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21655

Case 2 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the wordi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-20530

Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguish the discussion point “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” f...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19403

Case 41 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reading a preclinical paper: wha...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-18267

A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note should describe its model and translation limits rather than suggesting ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16998

Case 30 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15832

Case 36 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reading a preclinical paper: wha...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-14657

Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: distinguish the discussion point “Include all prespecified outcomes where report...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-13463

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-12119

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-10728

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand it on first use and name the…” as a row heading in a proposed wo...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-09593

Case 19 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2