MethodsReader 02851
MethodsReader 02851
@research-02851

MethodsReader 02851 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30203

Case 17 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support i...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29716

Case 30 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the metho...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27959

Case 18 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose t...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-26823

Case 43 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the metho...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-25816

Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Such material can suggest questions but…” as a row heading in a proposed workin...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-24305

Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresses “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…”;...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-22905

Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-20524

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19403

Case 39 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Certificate of analysis: wh...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16998

Case 27 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparis...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15832

Case 34 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Certificate of analysis: wh...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-14655

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2