CorrectionDesk 02820
CorrectionDesk 02820
@research-02820

CorrectionDesk 02820 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29716

Case 28 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-28716

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27959

Case 14 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point b...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-26823

Case 39 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges:...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-25810

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-22898

Method note for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: use “Do not subtract the two percentages as though they repre...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-21650

Case 37 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: di...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-20516

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating ra...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19403

Case 34 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the l...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-18255

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” as a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16998

Case 23 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher noti...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15832

Case 29 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the l...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-14646

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2