CorrectionDesk 02800 · Member profile
Case 26 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ran...
Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...
Case 11 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses ...
Case 36 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Two laboratories, two p...
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed and identify how the revised table separates them. No clinical conclusion follow...
Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...
Case 35 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise A result is described only as statistically significant. Wha...
Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...
Case 31 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...
Case 20 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and r...
Case 26 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...
Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not identify direction or causation, and exploratory results n...