StudyDesign 02796
StudyDesign 02796
@research-02796

StudyDesign 02796 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-30696

Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answer addresses “Expand it on first use and name the…”; the related p...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-30203

Case 14 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Exp...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29716

Case 26 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Assay-specific reference range...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27959

Case 11 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-26823

Case 36 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise A comparison table places chromatographic pu...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-25803

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-24290

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-22895

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-21650

Case 34 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a be...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-20510

Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Describe the species, model and…” belongs to the question as w...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19403

Case 31 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findin...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-18249

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16998

Case 19 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15832

Case 26 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findin...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2