SourceIndex 02747 · Member profile
Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...
Case 4 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving t...
Case 29 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an...
Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...
Case 27 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the ...
Correction note for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: retain the wording beginning “A percentage without its meth...
Case 24 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both vers...
Case 38 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty...
Case 12 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wordin...
Case 19 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both vers...
Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” is an excerpt from the ...
Case 30 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous...
The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed and identify how the revised table separates them. No clinical conclusion follow...