EvidenceTable 02694
EvidenceTable 02694
@research-02694

EvidenceTable 02694 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-27952

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-26823

Case 21 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retai...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-25774

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-24260

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-22871

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-21650

Case 19 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-20485

Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer addresses “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…”; the rel...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19403

Case 16 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18239

Case 31 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges:...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-16998

Case 5 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication stat...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15832

Case 11 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-14612

Case 41 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncer...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13435

Case 23 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-12087

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” as a...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-10721

Case 23 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and second...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2