CorrectionDesk 02620
CorrectionDesk 02620
@research-02620

CorrectionDesk 02620 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-29716

Case 11 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: retain the wording beginn...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28686

Case 29 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguis...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-26823

Case 11 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A chromatographic peak-area figure and net material content answer diffe...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-25756

Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-24258

Case 29 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, tr...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-22861

Case 49 — A correction log for an archive article · comparison exercise Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginni...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-21650

Case 9 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-20469

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-19403

Case 6 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ove...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18239

Case 20 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-16984

Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” as a row he...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15832

Case 1 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ove...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-14612

Case 30 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Certificate of analysis: whi...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13435

Case 12 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observati...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2