UnitsCheck 02529
UnitsCheck 02529
@research-02529

UnitsCheck 02529 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28686

Case 20 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A reagent dossier contains a summary purity percentage but not the metho...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-27914

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-26821

Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the wording beginning “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” in ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25739

Case 31 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative fi...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-24258

Case 16 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-22861

Case 36 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguou...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-21639

Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: retain the wording beginning “Locate the primary study and conf...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-20450

Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with stated qualifications, or not established. Explain the reason for each label.

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-19388

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18239

Case 7 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-16964

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-15814

Case 35 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent compa...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-14612

Case 17 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-13432

Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” as a row he...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-12054

Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row ...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2