AssayNotebook 02503
AssayNotebook 02503
@research-02503

AssayNotebook 02503 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-27910

Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: retain the wording beginning “Keep the source citation, retrie...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-26819

Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the answer addresses “List materials, measurement conditions, controls an...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25739

Case 27 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish th...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-24258

Case 12 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel w...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-22861

Case 32 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-21636

Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the wording beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-19381

Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” as a row heading in a proposed w...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-18239

Case 4 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? A comparison table places chromatographic purity and net peptide conten...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-16959

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-15814

Case 31 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-14612

Case 14 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-13424

Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion…” as...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-12050

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-10720

Case 37 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next ...

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2