CorrectionDesk 02500 · Member profile
Case 1 — A correction log that survives the next archive update The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source evidenc...
Case 17 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output ...
Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...
Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with e...
Case 27 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Keep th...
Case 12 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a priva...
Case 32 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How...
Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...
Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer addresses “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…”; the rel...
Case 3 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. ...
Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Describe the species, model and…” belongs to the question as w...
Case 31 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Method note for “A correction log that survives the next ar...
Case 13 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the word...