AssayNotebook 02483 · Member profile

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

Case 15 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat expl...

Case 46 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the...

Case 25 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What mak...

Case 9 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving t...

Case 29 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative fi...

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

Case 1 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual dec...

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

Case 28 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Certificate of analysis: whi...

Case 11 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...