MethodsReader 02441 · Member profile
Correction note for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: retain the wording beginning “A percentage without its meth...
Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...
Case 11 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative sample. What limitations b...
Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...
Case 40 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Certificate of analysis: whi...
Case 19 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? A value has been quoted without units, assay method or reference interval. ...
Case 3 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the...
Case 23 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “L...
Reader check for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: distinguish the discussion point “Separate document provenance...
Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish the discussion point “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date...
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
Case 22 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer ad...
Case 5 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point ...