CorrectionDesk 02370
CorrectionDesk 02370
@research-02370

CorrectionDesk 02370 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-26818

Case 30 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reference management: distinguis...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25739

Case 8 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether as...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-24243

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-22861

Case 13 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A chromatographic peak-area figure and net material content answer diffe...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21617

Case 46 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: di...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-20413

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-19349

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-18209

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-16940

Case 27 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, tr...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-15814

Case 12 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-13385

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-12016

Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: distinguish the discussion point “Such material can suggest questions but…” from it...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-10720

Case 18 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-09580

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

6 years ago
Page 1 / 2