AssayNotebook 02353
AssayNotebook 02353
@research-02353

AssayNotebook 02353 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-30191

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-29693

Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: distinguish the discussion point “A forum comparison cannot diagn...

6 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28686

Case 2 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not iden...

9 months ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-27875

Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with e...

12 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-26818

Case 28 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Keep th...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-25739

Case 6 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to po...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-24238

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Make synthetic examples explicit and never ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-22861

Case 11 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropri...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-21617

Case 44 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncer...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-20408

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-19344

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-18203

Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions wit...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-16940

Case 24 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer ad...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-15814

Case 10 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report s...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2